Morning Sun

Living Revolution | Heroes












Living Revolution | Heroes | Lei Feng

Lei Feng's Immortal Spirit

The Foolish Old Man and Other Heroes:
Although Some Sneer at the Stories, All Chinese Are Fed an Endless Diet of Role Models.
The Government Uses These Folk Sagas to Educate, Entertain -- and Control

Los Angeles Times May 8, 1990
Part H; Page 4; Column 1; Foreign Desk

By DAVID HOLLEY, TIMES STAFF WRITER

Lei Feng is a most unlikely hero.

A military man who died in a ridiculous accident, Lei Feng was a naive do-gooder whose highest goal was to be a "rustless screw" in the great machine of communism.

His short life, according to official histories, came to an abrupt end in 1962, when one of his comrades backed a truck into a utility pole. Lei, 22, failed to dodge, and the falling pole killed him.

An ignominious end? Not at all. The next year, Chairman Mao Tse-tung himself called on the entire nation to "learn from Lei Feng."

The resulting movement faded in the mid-1980s, as attention turned to material incentives and economic development. But now China is in the midst of a Lei Feng revival, thanks largely to last June's massacre of pro-democracy protesters in Beijing.

What's going on here?

Many things, at many levels.

For one thing, Lei has lots of company in a long and mostly honorable tradition of model figures.

There's the Foolish Old Man who moved the mountain, the hero of an old fable about perseverance. Mao revised the old man's story into a political tract on fighting imperialism. Then there are historical figures like the Song Dynasty general, Yue Fei, a model of patriotism for generations of schoolchildren. And there are new heroes like Lai Ning, a 14-year-old boy who died fighting a forest fire.

The use of moral suasion to educate and control the masses is quintessentially Chinese, with roots more than 2,000 years old. In the Communist era, Mao and his comrades could make good use of figures like Lei, an army truck driver who did voluntary work on construction projects and happily gave money to peasants.

"Chinese society from the beginning has this sense of people learning from good examples, rather than from sanctions imposed on them," commented Jerome A. Cohen, a former Harvard law professor living in Hong Kong. "It goes back to the whole Confucian ideal that rules and regulations are a last resort, that the good ruler sets the standard to which all should repair. The Communists built upon this."

Is it really surprising that the old men who crushed last spring's protests reach out nostalgically to a safely dead, good-hearted soldier who washed his comrades' socks without even being asked, and who, more important, never ever questioned authority? Who better to help refurbish the army's sullied image and promote social stability?

So what if sophisticated and cynical urbanites mock the new Lei Feng campaign? So what if despised "bourgeois liberals," tainted by Western ideas of individual rights, joke that the main thing to be learned from Lei Feng is to watch out for falling telephone poles?

Yang Baibing, 70, responsible for political controls within the army, declared in a speech launching the new campaign that Lei "will forever be a brilliant example from which to learn."

He then outlined the intended lessons:

* Love for the Communist Party and hatred of class enemies.

* Obedience to the party.

* Selfless service to the people.

* Thrifty living.

* Hard work in any assignment.

Yang also left no doubt that the campaign will press the claim that martial-law troops acted honorably in their June assault in Beijing, which left hundreds and perhaps thousands of civilians dead.

"In the struggle to stop turmoil and quell the counterrevolutionary rebellion . . . the units that implemented the tasks of enforcing martial law performed in an outstanding manner," Yang declared. "Their deeds can be described as a reappearance of the spirit of Lei Feng."

Old Lei Feng movies are now airing on television, while a new TV series is being created. Newspaper articles sing his praises and publicize new examples such as Zhang Zixiang, a "model soldier of the Lei Feng type" who gained fame earlier this year for repairing thousands of his comrades' home appliances free. Work units and schools organize public service activities in the name of studying Lei Feng.

Some people respond to all this with pure cynicism, others with seemingly unquestioning acceptance. Many have mixed feelings, believing that Lei was indeed a good person but that his legacy is being abused.

"I think everyone should try to be like Lei Feng," commented a middle-aged scientist. "But I don't like it when this is used for other purposes . . . like promoting the image of the army."

Lei's greatest influence is in schools, where his name and that of Lai, the teen-age forest-fire-fighting martyr, are often linked.

"Through the campaign of learning from Lai Ning and Lei Feng, the students have begun to consider the question of what is their world outlook," said Zhang Peilan, a math teacher at a Beijing middle school. "Before learning from Lai Ning, some of our students would compete about who could spend more money, who ate well, who had the more fashionable clothing."

Qi Xiaobin, a high school junior, explained how students should learn to place collective interests first.

"Lei Feng never had a sense of individualism," she said. "He acted for the public welfare. . . . When people consider their individual interests and collective interests, they must consider which is more important. . . . For example, when a test is coming soon but we also have a big classroom cleaning activity, should we participate in this program or go home and study? In this kind of situation, we have to make a distinction between individualism and collectivism. . . . We should participate and not say that because we have to study we can't come."

Even many adults who are cynical about this latest Lei Feng movement believe that education based on model individuals can be good for children.

But among the partially Westernized, urban intellectual elite of today's China, many believe that the Lei Feng campaign has it all wrong -- that what China actually needs is to abandon the whole Confucian legacy of meek obedience to authority.

"I think Lei Feng was just a stupid young soldier," said a graduate student. "He didn't really understand anything about our government. He was just obedient. This is the kind of people our government wants. They want to hold back society, because they know that if it develops, the government will crash down."

Times research assistant Nick Driver contributed to this story.

© 1990 The Times Mirror Company


About the Site | Living Revolution | Smash the Old World! | Reddest Red Sun | Stages of History | The East is Red
The Film | Multimedia | Images | Library | Site Map
Home

© Long Bow Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.